‘white paranoia’ spook hunters

White Gangscorporations_lincoln_quote

Prior to the 1940s, there were many Black and Latino clubs and clicks, but very few outright gangs. This was also true of the white population of Los Angeles. However, this changed in the 1940s. In the 1940s, the Black population doubled as people came to work building ships and weapons for the military during World War II. At the time, Blacks and Latinos were restricted in where they could live. Blacks had to live along Central Ave. and Latinos lived mostly in East LA. As the population increased, some whites feared that Blacks and Latinos would start living outside of these restricted areas. Huntington Park, Bell, South Gate, Inglewood, Compton, Gardena, and West LA all had organized white gangs that would seek out Blacks and Latinos and harass them or beat them up. The largest of these gangs were the Spook Hunters. “Spook” is a derogatory term used toward Black people. During the 1940s, the Ku Klux Klan also emerged in LA. The first Black and Latino gangs were in response to these white gangs. The gangs acted as protection for Black and Latino neighborhoods.  Incidents such as the Zoot Suit Riots, in which white marines attacked Latino zoot suiters, led to a higher degree of organization in the gangs of both Blacks and Latinos.

The Spook Hunters would often cross Alameda traveling west to violently attack black youths from the area.

Question about gun laws and self defense as a marijuana user.

“The State represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but as the State is a soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence.” -Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

Sandra Bland’s last video

“Go out there and be the greatest thing that you can.”

It is through legislation such as this, which will empower people again and aid in bringing down these tyrants from their pedestals, who are given free rein to murder and pillage without consequence.

The law states:

(i) A person is justified in using reasonable force against a public servant if the person reasonably believes the force is necessary to:
(1) protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force;
(2) prevent or terminate the public servant’s unlawful entry of or attack on the person’s dwelling, curtilage, or occupied motor vehicle; or
(3) prevent or terminate the public servant’s unlawful trespass on or criminal interference with property lawfully in the person’s possession, lawfully in possession of a member of the person’s immediate family, or belonging to a person whose property the person has authority to protect.

Read more about this law

Body Cameras For Tennessee Law …

Tremaine Wilbourn, 29, faces a first-degree murder charge in the death of Officer Sean Bolton, 33, according to, Memphis Police Director Toney Armstrong Wilbourn got out of the Mercedes, confronted Bolton, and they got into a physical struggle.

One half of the inmates in America are veterans.

Bolton was a former U.S. Marine and served a tour of duty in Iraq, police said. He joined the department in 2010.

Sgt. James Brown, 26, Survived Two Tours in Iraq Only to Die Begging for His Life in Texas Jail

Quote:This sheriff terrorist then pulled over and detained Deven Guilford for not showing his identification when requested. This incident escalated to a point that this white boy was tased. Out of view of a dash cam and after this sheriff terrorist turned his body cam off, and then executed Deven Guilford

Jonathan Frost – White Sheriff Terrorist Murders Deven Guilford

Former TX Judge Goes Off on ‘Character Assassination’ of Sandra Bland

X

 Question about gun laws and self defense as a marijuana user.

Consider the cost of a civil case.

There is a well known gun writer, Massad Ayoob, who specializes in being an expert witness in self defense cases. His projections for the cost of defending yourself in a criminal and civil trial for a righteous shooting are in the 10s of thousands of dollars I’m not sure how much it is these days because I don’t buy as many gun mags as I once did but the math is- do you want to loose some toys that can be insured or be in hock to a lawyer for the rest of your life for defending your right to self protection.

Massad Ayoob is the author of IN The Gravest Extreme a book about the use of deadly force and a good read for anyone who is considering owning a weapon for self defense.
One of the common themes of his writing is that anytime the shooter’s credibility can be questioned by law enforcement or a civil lawyer it will be and having drugs and guns together is just asking for trouble.

Just food for thought.JirugaBanned

  • Thanks for all the information Remover and 1956 I appreciate it.

    As for defending my property no one is going to make me feel guilty about that. I’m not some post modern Buddhist apologist if the person breaks into my home presents the very real risk of threatening my life in a bad area known for cop killings and break ins to the point where they had Officers going door to door my second or so day living there asking questions about the break ins.

    Judge Greg Mathis Dissects The Arrest & Death of Sandra Bland

     

  • Sister of man accused of killing police officer claims self defense.

    Man Not Charged After Shooting and Killing SWAT Officer in No-Knock Raid:

    A SWAT team aggressively invades somebody’s home in a no-knock raid based on information from a snitch, officer gets killed in an act of self-defense, the information turns out to be illegitimate, and then the people defending themselves and their property from unknown invaders are charged with capital murder or manslaughter. And coincidentally, they all happen to be drug-related cases. But a grand jury in Texas broke that pattern when they dropped all charges related to the shooting and killing of Deputy Adam Sowder during another botched no-knock raid.

    Indiana has taken action to “recognize the unique character of a citizen’s home and to ensure that a citizen feels secure in his or her own home against unlawful intrusion by another individual or a public servant.”

    This special amendment is no revolutionary new thought, only common sense.

    Self-defense is a natural right; when laws are in place that protect incompetent police by removing one’s ability to protect one’s self, simply because the aggressor has a badge and a uniform, this is a human rights violation. Indiana is leading the way by recognizing this right and creating legislation to protect it.

    Of course cops have already begun to fear monger the passage of this bill, “If I pull over a car and I walk up to it and the guy shoots me, he’s going to say, ‘Well, he was trying to illegally enter my property,’ ” said Joseph Hubbard, 40, president of Jeffersonville Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 100. “Somebody is going get away with killing a cop because of this law.”

    Instead of looking at the beneficial aspect of this law, which creates the incentive for police to act responsibly and just, Hubbard takes the ‘higher than thou’ attitude and is simply worried about himself.

    How about questioning the immoral laws that you are enforcing in the first place? Or how about sympathizing with the innocent people whose pets and family members have been slain, due to police negligence?

    Who’s to say that a cop pulling you over to extort money from you for the victimless crime of not wearing a seatbelt, isn’t an unlawful act? Or how about breaking down your door in the middle of the night to kidnap you and throw you in a cage for possessing a plant?

    Hopefully this legislation will lead to these arbitrary traffic and drug enforcement “laws” in place solely for revenue collection (aka theft), being brought into question.

    The law states:

    (i) A person is justified in using reasonable force against a public servant if the person reasonably believes the force is necessary to:
    (1) protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force;
    (2) prevent or terminate the public servant’s unlawful entry of or attack on the person’s dwelling, curtilage, or occupied motor vehicle; or
    (3) prevent or terminate the public servant’s unlawful trespass on or criminal interference with property lawfully in the person’s possession, lawfully in possession of a member of the person’s immediate family, or belonging to a person whose property the person has authority to protect.

    It is through legislation such as this, which will empower people again and aid in bringing down these tyrants from their pedestals, who are given free rein to murder and pillage without consequence.
    Read more at